Software developer at a big library, cyclist, photographer, hiker, reader. Email: chris@improbable.org
24333 stories
·
217 followers

Speed limiters for repeat offenders could have saved my daughter – Greater Greater Washington

1 Share

With one phone call, my life as I had known it was shattered: my daughter Jamya had been in a tragic car crash. It would never be her calling again, I would never hear her voice again. The phone call was from my daughter’s number—but it wasn’t her.

She was driving east through the intersection of 14th and K Streets NW in the early morning of July 3, 2021, when a driver traveling north on 14th Street sped through the red light, collided with her car at full force without stopping, and then fled the scene.

As a mom, you look forward to seeing your child fulfill her dreams. Would she become the cardiologist she always talked about, like the doctors on the TV screen she devotedly watched on every episode of Grey’s Anatomy? She also had a very kind soul, often bringing home shopping bags full of gifts for her loved ones and generously offering her colleagues a ride home from work on her days off. Jamya was just 20 years old when her life abruptly ended due to someone else’s reckless driving. It should have been the beginning of her finding her way in this thing called life. Instead, family and friends commemorate her by sharing cherished memories and reflecting on the profound impact she continues to have on our lives.

Tragically, too many families in the Washington region—and across the country—know the pain of wondering who their loved one would be, what could have been. It doesn’t have to be this way. We can save lives like Jamya’s with technology that exists today to limit speeds and reduce reckless driving—if only Mayor Bowser and the DC Council fund it.

In April, fellow members of the DC chapter of Families for Safe Streets shared their heartache of losing a loved one or suffering a serious injury in a traffic crash at a Council hearing to urge they address reckless driving on our streets and rapidly implement proven technology—intelligent speed assistance or speed limiters—to stop the most dangerous drivers before they kill someone. Requiring ISA for repeat offenders is part of a new law that passed called the Strengthening Traffic Enforcement, Education, and Responsibility (STEER) Act.

Repeat offenders are an overall small number of drivers that are disproportionately responsible for carnage on our streets. When someone drives drunk, we put a device in their car that prevents them from doing that again. When someone speeds, repeatedly, we should use similar technology to stop that because speeding is as dangerous as driving drunk.

Intelligent speed assistance is proven to work. One study attributed a 37% decrease in traffic deaths to the use of active ISA technology and another projects it at 50% if mandated in all vehicles. Moreover, it does not deny anyone mobility; it just ensures they travel our streets safely. Not speeding is the most basic expectation we should have about sharing public space.

We know the human cost of government’s failure to act; it is a price too-high for anyone to pay.

While much in the STEER Act will save lives, this component is a common sense, easy to implement, low-cost provision that will make a dramatic impact on the preventable public health crisis of traffic violence plaguing our communities. Washington, DC, was the first in the nation to require this life-saving measure. As the nation’s capital, we should be a leader in traffic safety but instead DC has had its highest record of traffic deaths last year and there has not been a significant improvement in recent years.

Installing speed limiters in the vehicles of the most reckless drivers is an approach that is strongly recommended by the National Traffic Safety Board, the Road to Zero Coalition, the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety and others. District leaders cannot continue to allow the most reckless drivers to terrorize DC residents and visitors with impunity. We cannot wait a year or more before we make our roads safer.

Finding the funds

The Council’s Transportation and Environment committee heard our members’ calls to fund speed limiters for the most reckless drivers, and included funds for ISA in its budget recommendations. While the Mayor’s original budget funded none of the safety provisions in the STEER Act, DC Families for Safe Streets is grateful that the committee saw the relatively low cost of ISA–$1.2 million–as a valuable investment in protecting residents and visitors to the city. It’s now up to the full Council to include funding for ISA in next year’s budget.

We already have a cost-effective mechanism in place to require ignition interlock devices in the vehicles of drunk drivers. We need to do the same with repeat speeding drivers. If a budget is a reflection of one’s values, then Mayor Bowser’s budget reflects her outlook on safe streets, Vision Zero, transit and biking, and driver accountability: she does not value it. The Council can correct that.

Speed limiters installed in the vehicles of DC’s most reckless drivers could save someone else’s child, or spouse, or parent. It could save you. And in a city where traffic fatalities are up nearly 93% in the past five years, in a country where traffic fatalities are at near record highs, using every tool we can to save lives matters.

Read the whole story
Share this story
Delete

The WCAG 3 Working Draft update is ready for your review

1 Share

The Accessibility Guidelines Working Group (AG WG) published an updated WCAG 3 Working Draft. For background and up-to-date information on W3C Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 3, please see WCAG 3 Introduction.

This draft includes potential outcomes that we are exploring. The final set of outcomes in WCAG 3 will be different from this draft. Outcomes will be edited, added, combined, and removed. 

The purpose of this draft is to:

  • better understand the scope of user needs and how they could be addressed in an accessibility standard, 
  • request assistance in identifying gaps, and
  • request assistance locating and conducting research to validate or invalidate the drafted outcomes. 

Some of the outcomes are marked as needing research. We are particularly interested in assistance identifying or conducting research to support or refute them.

For your review:

When reviewing this update, please focus on the Guidelines section. We did not make changes to conformance related sections.

Please consider the following questions when reviewing the outcomes in this draft:

  • What outcomes needed to make web content accessible are missing?
  • What research supports or refutes these outcomes?
  • Are any of these outcomes out of scope for accessibility standards? If so, please explain why.

To provide input, please file issues on GitHub, or if you are unable to use GitHub, send email to public-agwg-comments@w3.org.

Please create separate GitHub issues or email messages for each topic (rather than putting multiple topics in a single issue or email).

Thank you in advance for your contributions to WCAG 3. This draft reflects ongoing work on WCAG 3. If you have questions or concerns, please contact the AG Chairs via email to group-ag-chairs@w3.org.

Read the whole story
Share this story
Delete

Rare oysters being reintroduced to Firth of Forth

1 Share
Read the whole story
Share this story
Delete

16 years of CVE-2008-0166 - Debian OpenSSL Bug - Breaking DKIM and BIMI in 2024

1 Share
Read the whole story
Share this story
Delete

Ben Gvir calls to ‘encourage emigration,’ resettle Gaza at ultra-nationalist rally | The Times of Israel

1 Share

Cabinet ministers and MKs called for the rebuilding of Jewish settlements in Gaza at an ultra-nationalist march and rally attended by thousands in the town of Sderot, close to the Gaza border on Tuesday.

National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir declared that the “voluntary emigration” of Palestinians from Gaza should be promoted, Communications Minister Shlomo Karhi insisted that the resettling of Gaza was the only way to ensure Israeli security, and Religious Zionism MK Zvi Sukkot blamed the October 7 massacres on the 2005 Disengagement Plan.

Organizers claimed that some 50,000 people turned up for the Independence Day march promoted under the banner of building Jewish settlements in Gaza from where some 15 settlements and around 8,500 settlers were evacuated in 2005.

The Nachala Settler Movement, an organization with a radical history of illegal settlement activity, organized the event along with other hardline religious-Zionist and ultranationalist groups, including Hotam, Sovereignty and The Jewish Truth, among others.

Some 11,750 people had registered for the event as of Tuesday morning, but Nachala claimed that fully 50,000 turned out for the event.

During the march, Palestinian terror groups in Gaza fired three rockets at Sderot, forcing the participants to lie flat during the event due to the lack of cover. The rockets were intercepted by air defense systems, the Sderot Municipal Authority said.

National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir calls for ‘voluntary emigration’ of Palestinians from Gaza and the resettling of Gaza by Israel at a march and rally in the town of Sderot close to the Gaza border, May 14, 2024. (Courtesy Office of National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir)

At the rally, a presentation was made of the six cadres formed by Nachala for the establishment of six new settlements in Gaza that were first unveiled at a resettle Gaza conference held in Jerusalem in January, which was also organized by Nachala and drew international condemnation.

“To end the problem, in order that the problem won’t come back, we need to do two things: one return to Gaza now! Return home! Return to our holy land! said Ben Gvir from the stage of the rally set up at the end of the march.

“And second, encourage emigration. Encourage the voluntary departure of Gaza’s residents…It is ethical! It is rational! It is right! It is the truth! It is the Torah and it is the only way! And yes, it is humane,” he continued.

This is the second time the ultra-nationalist minister has publicly promoted Palestinian emigration from Gaza as a means of resolving the conflict, having done so at a January resettle Gaza conference.

Karhi, a hard-right member of the Likud party, made similar comments.

“In order to preserve the security achievements for which so many of our troops gave up their lives for, we must settle Gaza, with security forces and with settlers,” said Karhi at the rally.

Thousands of people turn out for an ultra-nationalist march and rally in the Gaza-border town of Sderot to call for the rebuilding of Jewish settlements in Gaza, May 14, 2024. (Courtesy Nachala Settlement Movement)

“This is not because there is no other option, but out of a deep understanding that this is the only real way, both to exact a heavy price from the Nazis, from Hamas, and to protect our people and our homeland. We will wipe out the disgrace of the year 2005 with settlement in the year 2024-2025, God willing,” said the minister.

Sukkot, an ultra-nationalist MK with a long record of illegal settlement activism, said the march was designed to “rectify the terrible crime of expelling Jews from Gush Katif,” using the Hebrew term for the Gaza settlements that were evacuated during the Disengagement.

“Those who expelled the Jews of Gush Katif are directly responsible, with their own hands, for the terrible massacre of Simchat Torah,” in reference to the October 7 atrocities perpetrated by Hamas last year.

“They disparaged us then, they got hundreds of generals and ‘security experts’ to sign [declarations] that the Disengagement would bring about security…we shouted ourselves hoarse but they didn’t care.”

Sukkot, like Ben Gvir, also called to promote Palestinian emigration from Gaza, adding that Israel should “tell the countries of the world who with hypocritical morality care for the Gazans that they [Gazans] will be much safer with them in other countries. If they love them so much, South Africa should take the residents of Jabaliya.”

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has rejected the idea of Israeli civilians resettling Gaza. The idea of Palestinians from Gaza finding new homes outside after the war has also been widely rejected by the international community, in particular Arab nations, who have insisted that there be no further displacement of Palestinians from the West Bank and Gaza.

The US has called earlier calls by Ben Gvir “inflammatory and irresponsible.”

Is our live war coverage important to you?

Are you relying on The Times of Israel for accurate and timely coverage right now? If so, please join The Times of Israel Community. For as little as $6/month, you will:

Join the Times of Israel Community Join our Community Already a member? Sign in to stop seeing this

You're a dedicated reader

We’re really pleased that you’ve read X Times of Israel articles in the past month.

That’s why we started the Times of Israel eleven years ago - to provide discerning readers like you with must-read coverage of Israel and the Jewish world.

So now we have a request. Unlike other news outlets, we haven’t put up a paywall. But as the journalism we do is costly, we invite readers for whom The Times of Israel has become important to help support our work by joining The Times of Israel Community.

For as little as $6 a month you can help support our quality journalism while enjoying The Times of Israel AD-FREE, as well as accessing exclusive content available only to Times of Israel Community members.

Thank you,
David Horovitz, Founding Editor of The Times of Israel

Join Our Community Join Our Community Already a member? Sign in to stop seeing this
Read the whole story
Share this story
Delete

Jewish staffer resigns from Biden administration over Gaza - The Washington Post

1 Share

A Jewish American Biden political appointee resigned from her post at the Interior Department on Wednesday, saying she could no longer work for the administration because of President Biden’s continued support of Israel’s war in Gaza.

Lily Greenberg Call, special assistant to the chief of staff in the Interior Department, cited her Jewish upbringing and ties to Israel in her resignation letter. She wrote that her family escaped antisemitic persecution in Europe and came to the United States, noting that they changed their names at Ellis Island and that her grandparents could not go to college.

Read the whole story
Share this story
Delete
Next Page of Stories